<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Science of Word Recognition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalmediaminute.com/article/1046/the-science-of-word-recognition/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalmediaminute.com/article/1046/the-science-of-word-recognition</link>
	<description>News that matters for Web Developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Connault</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmediaminute.com/article/1046/the-science-of-word-recognition/comment-page-1#comment-19903</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Connault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 00:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19903</guid>
		<description>Research at Cambridge University, huh? People are so gullible. . .  Have you thought about the fact that you already know what the paragraph is about before you read it? What about the context? It&#039;s possible to guess a word even if all you see is _ _ _ _ _ if it&#039;s the right context. And what about this sentence, can you read it? :

 An altelusoby, roluisculidy portesuropes calutocenotipasin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Research at Cambridge University, huh? People are so gullible. . .  Have you thought about the fact that you already know what the paragraph is about before you read it? What about the context? It&#8217;s possible to guess a word even if all you see is _ _ _ _ _ if it&#8217;s the right context. And what about this sentence, can you read it? :</p>
<p> An altelusoby, roluisculidy portesuropes calutocenotipasin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rawlinson</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmediaminute.com/article/1046/the-science-of-word-recognition/comment-page-1#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Rawlinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>I have actually seen something similar to this before via slashdot..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the article i read, sorry I can&#8217;t remember where it was exactly, stated that we use the size of the word, and the first/last letters to recognize the word &#8211; as opposed to the shape/contents of the word.  For instance so long as the first and last letter of the word remain correct, it doesn&#8217;t matter what order the inner letters are in &#8211; we can still generally read an understand the writing &#8211; here is an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
its pterty wlid taht you can fgiure out waht semonoe is syiang eevn wehn the wrdos are all srmabelcd up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some scrambled words are harder to recognize than others &#8211; but in general it is amazing how well most people do with a text in this fashion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#8217;t think people can read as quickly when looking at text that is mucked up &#8211; but the fact that we can read it without significant pause is pretty remarkable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have actually seen something similar to this before via slashdot..</p>
<p>the article i read, sorry I can&#8217;t remember where it was exactly, stated that we use the size of the word, and the first/last letters to recognize the word &#8211; as opposed to the shape/contents of the word.  For instance so long as the first and last letter of the word remain correct, it doesn&#8217;t matter what order the inner letters are in &#8211; we can still generally read an understand the writing &#8211; here is an example:</p>
<p>its pterty wlid taht you can fgiure out waht semonoe is syiang eevn wehn the wrdos are all srmabelcd up.</p>
<p>Some scrambled words are harder to recognize than others &#8211; but in general it is amazing how well most people do with a text in this fashion.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think people can read as quickly when looking at text that is mucked up &#8211; but the fact that we can read it without significant pause is pretty remarkable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emeric</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmediaminute.com/article/1046/the-science-of-word-recognition/comment-page-1#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Emeric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>As Bill says, I wonder how the &#8220;shape&#8221; theory could be true while this below is working so well : &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde uinervtisy, it deosn&#8217;t mttaer waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteres are at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a tatol mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Bill says, I wonder how the &#8220;shape&#8221; theory could be true while this below is working so well : </p>
<p>Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde uinervtisy, it deosn&#8217;t mttaer waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteres are at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a tatol mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

